Warning with Gmsh, with ver 0.17 FEM: Error even with calculation

About the development of the FEM module/workbench.

Moderator: bernd

Post Reply
atakebones
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2019 3:48 am

Warning with Gmsh, with ver 0.17 FEM: Error even with calculation

Post by atakebones »

I tried on win10 64bit, but warning of Gmsh
Warning: Surface mesh: worst distortion = -1.09168 (avg = 0.977715, 8 elements with jac.

  I can calculate it.
* ERROR in e_c3d: nonpositive jacobian
determinant in element 31324
* ERROR in e_c3d: nonpositive jacobian
determinant in element 31392
* ERROR in e_c3d: nonpositive jacobian
determinant in element 31392
Factoring the system of equations using the symmetric spools solver
Using up to 1 cpu (s) for spooles.
15.0: CalculiX done!
15.2: Loading result sets ...
And no result comes out,
If you know the solution, please tell me.
By the way, it doesn't work well with NetGen because it is thin.
Jee-Bee
Veteran
Posts: 2566
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 10:32 am
Location: Netherlands

Re: Warning with Gmsh, with ver 0.17 FEM: Error even with calculation

Post by Jee-Bee »

Calculix breaks(read stop calculation) with negative jacobian...

I guess this happens a lot. Best it to decrease the meshsize (locally where the negative jacobians are) till the message about the negative jacobian isn't throwed anymore. Than the calculation will finish
Jee-Bee
Veteran
Posts: 2566
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 10:32 am
Location: Netherlands

Re: Warning with Gmsh, with ver 0.17 FEM: Error even with calculation

Post by Jee-Bee »

I saw that you are using 0.17. It is better to use at least 0.18. Using the development version (0.19) would be better for using FEM.
User avatar
bernd
Veteran
Posts: 12851
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 8:07 pm
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Warning with Gmsh, with ver 0.17 FEM: Error even with calculation

Post by bernd »

Yeah, simple workaround is to decrease mesh size ! and yes use 0.18.2 or even better 0.19 version for FEM! see https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=12212
Post Reply