Opinion ON FEM Result

About the development of the FEM module/workbench.

Moderator: bernd

thschrader
Veteran
Posts: 3158
Joined: Sat May 20, 2017 12:06 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Opinion ON FEM Result

Post by thschrader »

Laurie Hartley wrote: Sat Dec 07, 2019 9:34 pm tschrader - apologies. This is the file I should have linked.

https://mega.nz/#!OsYA1KTA!1EFc8XP9b_Jk ... uAGPk44mDg
Thanks for the file, but our IT-Service blocks mega.nz. I will have a look at my private
computer next weekend. Lot of work... :)
Laurie Hartley
Posts: 526
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 5:33 am
Location: Australia

Re: Opinion ON FEM Result

Post by Laurie Hartley »

Thanks - I appreciate your help. :D
thschrader
Veteran
Posts: 3158
Joined: Sat May 20, 2017 12:06 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Opinion ON FEM Result

Post by thschrader »

Laurie Hartley wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2019 8:25 am Thanks - I appreciate your help. :D
Downloaded your file, thanks.
To run a FEM-analysis (with 3D-element) on such a huge structure is nearly impossible. For a normal PC.
Even if you ca fuse all details and the struts to one object, you will get millions of elements.
You should run a gloabal analysis with a frame-program and check the details with FEM.
As we discussed here:
https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?t=34638
Laurie Hartley
Posts: 526
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 5:33 am
Location: Australia

Re: Opinion ON FEM Result

Post by Laurie Hartley »

Thanks thschrader, I will follow your advice and see how I go with Mr Wolsinks programme.

Thank you once more for your help.
Post Reply