Is there anyone willing to adopt maintainership of a new package: Z88.
There is a PKGBUILD ready to go at https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php ... 7#p1830477
Currently Z88 isn't a is a minimally supported FEM Solver in FreeCAD. But it may someday. Better adoption in the package ecosystem could facilitate it's use extending its support in FC.
Edit: @sgrogan corrected me
Looking for an Arch Linux Package maintainer for Z88 (FEM Solver)
Looking for an Arch Linux Package maintainer for Z88 (FEM Solver)
Alone you go faster. Together we go farther
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
Re: Looking for an Arch Linux Package maintainer for Z88 (FEM Solver)
Actually its minimally supported, just not all features. Z88 has a few components with varying licenses. On Win it's z88r that we need.
"fight the good fight"
Re: Looking for an Arch Linux Package maintainer for Z88 (FEM Solver)
yep, what sgrogan wrote fits very well.
BTW: Z88 solver in FreeCAD seams not used by anyone ATM. The implementation was more a proof of concept to make FreeCAD FEM capable of work with multiple solvers. I knew Z88, it was OS, there was a package for Debian, I took Z88. I made it public on Z88 forum but noone was interested.
May be one day someone with interest will arise ...
BTW: Z88 solver in FreeCAD seams not used by anyone ATM. The implementation was more a proof of concept to make FreeCAD FEM capable of work with multiple solvers. I knew Z88, it was OS, there was a package for Debian, I took Z88. I made it public on Z88 forum but noone was interested.
May be one day someone with interest will arise ...
Re: Looking for an Arch Linux Package maintainer for Z88 (FEM Solver)
BTW FreeCAD FEM runs with Z88 version 13 from debian too. But this is years, really years, around 5, old.
Re: Looking for an Arch Linux Package maintainer for Z88 (FEM Solver)
Is it a lot to update to v15 ?
Alone you go faster. Together we go farther
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
Re: Looking for an Arch Linux Package maintainer for Z88 (FEM Solver)
@bernd bump
Alone you go faster. Together we go farther
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
- kkremitzki
- Veteran
- Posts: 2517
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 9:52 pm
- Location: Illinois
Re: Looking for an Arch Linux Package maintainer for Z88 (FEM Solver)
This is probably something I would take care of... last time I looked it didn't seem like it would be too much work to update Z88 but also not necessarily much benefit. (This could be a chicken-and-egg problem though.)
Re: Looking for an Arch Linux Package maintainer for Z88 (FEM Solver)
I agree. Given that time is limited, maybe netgen and it's python bindings would return more ROI, or VTK and It's python bindings, or paraview-python?kkremitzki wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2019 7:02 pm This is probably something I would take care of... last time I looked it didn't seem like it would be too much work to update Z88 but also not necessarily much benefit. (This could be a chicken-and-egg problem though.)
Maybe a poll in FEM? The question isn't would you like z88 packages, but rather would you like z88 or netgen python binding, for ex.
I wonder what @bernd would do with python bindings for netgen or vtk
"fight the good fight"