Best practice: fuselage + wing

A place to share learning material: written tutorials, videos, etc.
Forum rules
Be nice to others! Respect the FreeCAD code of conduct!
svenair
Posts: 84
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:55 pm

Re: Best practice: fuselage + wing

Post by svenair »

So, the Scale of the Image had not worked..

But I had drawn a little Bit of the Fuselage..

I draw the View from Above,
but this is not the Axis of the Plane that would have.

So, I angled a Datum Plane and created a new Sketch.

I take the Sketch of the last View and projected it as External Geometry,
but now I don't know how to switch it to a normal Line..
Attachments
Screenshot_20200104_161226.png
Screenshot_20200104_161226.png (182.64 KiB) Viewed 2834 times
ASK21B.FCStd
(157.64 KiB) Downloaded 101 times
Last edited by svenair on Sat Jan 04, 2020 3:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
soaring
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2016 10:27 pm

Re: Best practice: fuselage + wing

Post by soaring »

currently i'm reading the book "FreeCAD For Inventors" from Brad in order to be sure i didn't missed freecad concept cause when i design i'm rapidely locked....i'll tried to help when i'll be better un basics practice, i read as fast i possible :)
svenair
Posts: 84
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:55 pm

Re: Best practice: fuselage + wing

Post by svenair »

soaring wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2020 3:32 pm currently i'm reading the book "FreeCAD For Inventors" from Brad in order to be sure i didn't missed freecad concept cause when i design i'm rapidely locked....i'll tried to help when i'll be better un basics practice, i read as fast i possible :)
Good Think!

I'm a bit further but, I now beeing stopped on another Point..

And I allways think, there is an Failure.

There must be Knots, where the different Sketches ore coming together in Point.

And I have no Idea, how to manage it..

Its hard..
Attachments
Screenshot_20200104_170058.png
Screenshot_20200104_170058.png (130.56 KiB) Viewed 2827 times
ASK21B.FCStd
(229.39 KiB) Downloaded 120 times
soaring
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2016 10:27 pm

Re: Best practice: fuselage + wing

Post by soaring »

If it can help, i've just read that a macro exist for scaling : "image scaling macro"

And as i understand, there is no need to join sketchs, just select sketchs and apply a Gordon operation with curves workbench and it would deal with interpolation.

But no solid...i saw that curves author did a button to create a solid from Gordon surface created by closing it, i Guess it works as is but didn't play with it yet
User avatar
christi
Posts: 208
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2018 7:03 am
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
Contact:

Re: Best practice: fuselage + wing

Post by christi »

I have another approach to create a wing.
1. Draw or import a wing profile in the XZ layer
2. Draw the top view of the wing in the XY layer
3. Draw the front view in the YZ layer
4. Create multiple copies of the wing profile and move and resize the elements in the bounds of the top view and the front view drawings
5. Create a Loft over all the wing profiles

I have created the CurvedShapes workbench for doing 4. and 5.
https://github.com/chbergmann/CurvedShapesWorkbench

I tried to make a model of the flying wing Horten Ho 229 (also called Horten H IX)
Image

In the CurvedShapes workbench there is a menu entry "Horten HIX" that creates the above design from a script.
soaring
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2016 10:27 pm

Re: Best practice: fuselage + wing

Post by soaring »

@christi : I'm very interested in the acurracy of the gordon surface approach, can you tell us if there are some possibilities with it in your workbench (i'm not an expert and not a mathematician...) ?
soaring
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2016 10:27 pm

Re: Best practice: fuselage + wing

Post by soaring »

@christi, i've just played with your workbench regarding @GlouGlou post : https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic. ... 9&start=20 and it works like a charm, it's so easy to do a solid for boolean operation and the cutting function will be very helpfull !

thanks to your amazing work, it seems that Glouglou use "Curved shapes" workbench and "Curves" workbench through interpolation curves available in "Curves worbench". Very smart !

one thing i dont understand now is the use of Comb from the "Curves" worbench, if someone can switch on my light :)
soaring
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2016 10:27 pm

Re: Best practice: fuselage + wing

Post by soaring »

@svenair new activity on the Curves thread could be helpfull for fuselage design and your questions : https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic. ... &start=540 i will ask if results can profit to this thread...
svenair
Posts: 84
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:55 pm

Re: Best practice: fuselage + wing

Post by svenair »

soaring wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2020 3:50 pm @svenair new activity on the Curves thread could be helpfull for fuselage design and your questions : https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic. ... &start=540 i will ask if results can profit to this thread...
Oh, yes I will take another lokk at it.
User avatar
christi
Posts: 208
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2018 7:03 am
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
Contact:

Re: Best practice: fuselage + wing

Post by christi »

soaring wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2020 1:38 pm @christi : I'm very interested in the acurracy of the gordon surface approach, can you tell us if there are some possibilities with it in your workbench (i'm not an expert and not a mathematician...) ?
CurvedArray surfaces from the Curved Shapes workbench are created with a different approach then gordon surfaces from the Curves workbench.
CurvedArrays connects multiple copies of a 2D shape which are resized in 2 dimensions. This may be inaccurate at places with a high curvation (mostly at the ends of the surface) where the resized items become very small. More items will make the CurvedArray more accurate.

Gordon allows you to create more complex surfaces, but it is more difficult to create them. You have to create some curves first that will form a surface. The accuracy depends on how good your curves are.

I am thinking about distributing the items in the CurvedArray in a non linear way to get a better accuracy at places where the curvation is high, but I still have no good idea how to do this.
Post Reply